How do ecologists measure the biodiversity of a habitat — and what does that number tell us about ecosystem health?
Your work auto-saves as you go. If the period ends, you can return to this exact spot later.
Read carefully. The bolded terms appear on the vocabulary cards on the next page — and on the Battle Boss.
If you wanted to know how many species of plants and insects lived in a forest, you couldn't count every single one — there are far too many. Instead, ecologists use sampling: they study a small, representative piece of the habitat and use that to estimate the whole. One of the most common sampling tools is the quadrat — a square frame (often 1 m × 1 m) made of PVC pipe, wood, or even a hula hoop, that is dropped or laid down on the ground. Whatever is inside the frame is counted; whatever is outside is ignored.
To avoid bias, scientists practice random sampling. If you only placed quadrats where it looked "interesting," you'd skew the data. Real ecologists generate random coordinates (using a random number table or app) or toss the quadrat over their shoulder without looking. Many quadrats are needed — the more samples, the more accurate the estimate.
Inside each quadrat, ecologists record the species richness (how many different species are present) and the relative abundance (how many individuals of each species). When IDing each individual species is too hard — especially with insects or small plants — they sort them into morphospecies, grouping organisms that look similar even if their exact species name isn't known.
Two communities can have the same number of species but feel completely different. Imagine Site A with 100 individuals split as 25-25-25-25 across four species, and Site B with 97 of one species and 1 each of three others. Both have a richness of 4, but Site A has high species evenness — individuals are distributed evenly — while Site B is dominated by one species. Biodiversity measures both richness AND evenness, which is why ecologists use indices like the Simpson's Diversity Index.
Why does this matter? A biodiverse community is more resilient. If one species crashes — say, a disease wipes out the dominant tree — a diverse forest still has dozens of others to fill the niche. A monoculture lawn? Lose the grass, and the system collapses. Biodiversity also drives ecosystem services: pollination, water filtration, nutrient cycling, carbon storage, and the food and medicine humans depend on.
Now consider what happens when a continuous habitat is cut into pieces — a highway through a forest, suburbs eating into prairie. This is habitat fragmentation. The smaller fragments have proportionally more edge — the boundary where one ecosystem meets another. Edges experience the edge effect: more light, more wind, more invasive species, more predators. Interior-loving species like the wood thrush or ovenbird may vanish from small fragments even if the total acreage looks adequate on a map.
Today you'll act as a field ecologist: toss virtual quadrats in two contrasting habitats on a school campus, calculate Simpson's D for each, and use your data to explain why edge effects matter for conservation.
Scenario: Behind your school there is a mown athletic field and, across a fence, a forest edge where the lawn meets a small stand of native oaks. You're going to sample three random quadrats in each habitat, identify the species inside each quadrat, and use your totals to calculate Simpson's Diversity Index for each site.
Each 1 m × 1 m quadrat will land in a different random spot. The simulation tallies how many individuals of each species fall inside the frame. Your job: collect the data, total it, calculate D, and decide which habitat is more biodiverse — and why.
After 3 tosses per habitat, the totals are filled in automatically — but you'll use these numbers to do Simpson's math by hand below.
| Species (morphospecies) | Habitat A · # individuals | Habitat B · # individuals |
|---|
| Species | n | n/N | (n/N)² |
|---|
| Species | n | n/N | (n/N)² |
|---|
Beginning in 1979, ecologists Thomas Lovejoy and Richard Bierregaard convinced ranchers north of Manaus, Brazil, to leave behind isolated patches of Amazon rainforest as the surrounding land was cleared for cattle. The result — the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) — became one of the longest-running ecological experiments in the world. Square fragments of 1, 10, and 100 hectares were left standing, separated from continuous forest by 80–650 meters of pasture. Researchers compared the biodiversity inside each fragment to the unbroken forest nearby.
The findings have shaped modern conservation biology. Within just a few years of isolation:
The BDFFP team's conclusion was stark: in tropical forests, area alone is a poor predictor of biodiversity once fragmentation enters the picture. A single large reserve protects far more interior-dependent species than several small reserves with the same total acreage — a debate ecologists call SLOSS (Single Large Or Several Small).
The graph below shows simulated data based on the BDFFP findings — the relationship between fragment size and bird species richness 10 years after isolation. Use it to answer the questions that follow.
Figure 1. Bird species richness vs. forest fragment size, 10 years after isolation (BDFFP, simulated).
Each correctly-answered cell = 1 point toward your lab grade (25 cells, 25 points).
Click below to lock in your work and calculate your final score. Once graded, you can print the entire lab to PDF for submission.