← Earth Science ← Marine Biology

🌊 Ocean Acidification

🌍 πŸ‹

🌊 Ocean Acidification Lab

0%
Section 01
What Is Ocean Acidification?
Read the passage below carefully. You will answer questions using evidence from the text and Hochman writing strategies.
πŸ“ 8 Points β€” 1 pt per question | 70% to advance
πŸ“– Reading Passage

Since the Industrial Revolution, humans have released massive amounts of carbon dioxide (COβ‚‚) into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels, deforesting land, and manufacturing goods. The ocean has absorbed approximately 30% of this excess atmospheric COβ‚‚, which has fundamentally altered the chemistry of seawater. When COβ‚‚ dissolves in seawater, it reacts with water molecules to form carbonic acid (Hβ‚‚CO₃). This process lowers the ocean's pH, making it more acidic β€” a phenomenon scientists call ocean acidification.

The ocean's average surface pH has decreased from approximately 8.2 to 8.1 since pre-industrial times. While this may seem like a small change, the pH scale is logarithmic, meaning this 0.1 decrease represents a roughly 26% increase in hydrogen ion concentration. If current COβ‚‚ emission trends continue, ocean pH could drop to 7.8 by the year 2100, representing a 150% increase in acidity compared to pre-industrial levels.

This shift in ocean chemistry has profound effects on marine life, particularly calcifying organisms β€” species that build shells or skeletons from calcium carbonate (CaCO₃). These include corals, oysters, clams, sea urchins, and certain species of plankton called coccolithophores. As ocean pH drops, the concentration of carbonate ions (CO₃²⁻) decreases, making it harder for these organisms to build and maintain their calcium carbonate structures. In severely acidic conditions, existing shells and coral skeletons can actually begin to dissolve.

The impacts extend far beyond shell-building species. Ocean acidification disrupts the behavior and physiology of fish, impairs the ability of marine larvae to navigate and settle in suitable habitats, and weakens the structural integrity of coral reefs that provide habitat for approximately 25% of all marine species. Scientists have found that some fish exposed to acidified water exhibit impaired decision-making, reduced predator avoidance, and altered sensory perception. These cascading effects threaten the stability of entire marine ecosystems and the human communities that depend on them for food, economic activity, and coastal protection.

Hochman Strategy β€” Because, But, So
Sentence Expansion Activity

Complete each sentence stem using evidence from the reading passage. Write in complete, detailed sentences.

HOCHMAN 1 OF 3
The ocean absorbs approximately 30% of atmospheric COβ‚‚ because...
0 words
HOCHMAN 2 OF 3
The ocean's pH has only dropped by 0.1 units, but...
0 words
HOCHMAN 3 OF 3
Ocean acidification impacts extend beyond just calcifying organisms, so...
0 words
πŸ“‹ Comprehension Check
Reading Comprehension Questions
Section 02
COβ‚‚ & pH Interactive Investigation
Use the simulator to complete three structured data collection activities. Record all observations carefully, then respond to Hochman writing prompts using your evidence.
πŸ“ 8 Points β€” 1 pt per task | 70% to advance
πŸ§ͺ Interactive pH Simulator
Atmospheric COβ‚‚ Concentration 280 ppm
Pre-Industrial (280 ppm) Current (~420 ppm) 2100 Projection (1000 ppm)
Ocean Temperature 15Β°C
Polar (5Β°C) Temperate (15Β°C) Tropical (35Β°C)
🧊 Arctic Ocean
8.20
pH Level
🌊 Atlantic Ocean
8.18
pH Level
🏝️ Pacific Ocean
8.15
pH Level
β˜€οΈ Indian Ocean
8.12
pH Level
🐚 Organism Health Monitor
Real-Time Impact on Marine Organisms
πŸͺΈ
Coral Reefs
pH threshold: 7.8
Healthy
πŸ¦ͺ
Oysters
pH threshold: 7.75
Healthy
πŸ¦”
Sea Urchins
pH threshold: 7.7
Healthy
πŸ”¬
Coccolithophores
pH threshold: 7.85
Healthy
πŸ“ Data Collection Rule 1
4 pts
COβ‚‚ vs. pH β€” Controlled Temperature Trial

Procedure: Set temperature to 15Β°C (constant). For each COβ‚‚ level listed below, record the pH from all four ocean regions.

COβ‚‚ (ppm)🧊 Arctic🌊 Atlantic🏝️ Pacificβ˜€οΈ Indian
280
560
1000
πŸ“ Data Collection Rule 2
4 pts
Temperature vs. pH β€” Controlled COβ‚‚ Trial

Procedure: Set COβ‚‚ to 420 ppm (constant β€” current levels). For each temperature, record the Arctic and Indian Ocean pH, then calculate the difference.

Temperature🧊 Arctic pHβ˜€οΈ Indian pHDifference
5Β°C (Polar)
15Β°C (Temperate)
25Β°C (Subtropical)
35Β°C (Tropical)
OBSERVATION
Based on your data, describe how temperature affects COβ‚‚ absorption and ocean pH. Which waters are more vulnerable β€” cold or warm? Why?
0 words
πŸ“ Data Collection Rule 3
4 pts
Organism Threshold Investigation

Procedure: Set temperature to 15Β°C. Slowly increase COβ‚‚ from 280 ppm and watch the Organism Health Monitor. Find the approximate COβ‚‚ level (ppm) where each organism first changes from Healthy β†’ Stressed, and when it reaches Dissolving.

OrganismCOβ‚‚ at "Stressed"COβ‚‚ at "Dissolving"Most Sensitive?
πŸͺΈ Coral Reefs
πŸ¦ͺ Oysters
πŸ¦” Sea Urchins
πŸ”¬ Coccolithophores
✏️ Hochman Strategy β€” Because, But, So
13 pts
Data Analysis Writing

Using your data from the three collection rules, complete each sentence stem with specific evidence from your observations.

HOCHMAN 1 OF 4
As atmospheric COβ‚‚ increased from 280 to 1000 ppm, ocean pH decreased because...
0 words
HOCHMAN 2 OF 4
Cold polar waters showed lower pH readings than warm tropical waters, but...
0 words
HOCHMAN 3 OF 4
Coccolithophores were the first organism to become stressed in the simulation, so...
0 words
HOCHMAN 4 OF 4
Based on my threshold data, the vulnerability order from most to least sensitive is __________ because...
0 words
Section 03
Cascading Effects on Marine Ecosystems
Explore how ocean acidification creates chain reactions through food webs and ecosystems. Use Hochman strategies to construct your analysis.
πŸ“ 21 Points β€” 1 pt per question | 70% to advance
πŸ“– Reading Passage

Ocean acidification does not affect all marine species equally, and its impacts ripple through ecosystems in complex and often unpredictable ways. Pteropods, sometimes called "sea butterflies," are tiny marine snails with thin calcium carbonate shells that are highly vulnerable to acidification. Despite their small size, pteropods are a critical food source for salmon, herring, mackerel, and even whales. Research in the Southern Ocean has shown that pteropod shells are already dissolving in regions where pH has dropped below 8.0, potentially destabilizing food webs that billions of people depend on for protein.

Coral reefs face a double threat: warming waters cause coral bleaching, while acidification weakens the calcium carbonate framework that gives reefs their structure. Without healthy coral, the thousands of species that depend on reef habitat β€” from clownfish to sea turtles β€” lose their shelter, breeding grounds, and food sources. Scientists estimate that if ocean pH falls below 7.8, most tropical coral reefs will shift from net growth to net dissolution, meaning they will erode faster than they can rebuild.

The economic consequences are staggering. The global shellfish industry, worth over $20 billion annually, faces declining harvests as oyster larvae fail to form shells in increasingly acidic hatchery waters. In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, oyster farmers have already experienced catastrophic larval die-offs linked to upwelling of acidified deep water. Meanwhile, coral reef tourism generates approximately $36 billion per year worldwide. The loss of these ecosystems would devastate coastal economies, particularly in developing nations where marine resources provide both food security and livelihoods.

πŸ“‹ Case Study A
Whiskey Creek Shellfish Hatchery β€” Oregon, USA

In 2007, the Whiskey Creek Shellfish Hatchery in Tillamook Bay, Oregon experienced an unprecedented crisis. Oyster larvae suddenly began dying in massive numbers β€” production dropped by nearly 80% over two seasons. Scientists discovered that seasonal upwelling events were bringing deep, COβ‚‚-rich water to the surface along the Pacific coast. This water, which had absorbed carbon dioxide decades earlier when it sank to the ocean floor, had a pH as low as 7.4 β€” far below the 8.0 threshold needed for healthy larval development.

Hatchery manager Alan Barton and Oregon State University researcher Burke Hales installed real-time water chemistry monitoring systems. They found that the most corrosive water arrived between midnight and early morning, when offshore winds intensified upwelling. By adjusting their intake schedules to avoid the most acidic water and treating incoming water with sodium carbonate to raise pH, the hatchery was able to recover production. However, wild oyster populations in the bay, which cannot avoid acidic water, continued to show recruitment failures.

πŸ“Š DATA TABLE β€” Whiskey Creek Hatchery Water Chemistry
TimepHCOβ‚‚ (ppm in water)Larval Survival
6:00 AM7.41,2008%
10:00 AM7.868042%
2:00 PM8.138089%
6:00 PM8.042076%
10:00 PM7.695021%
CASE STUDY A β€” QUESTION 1

Complete each of the three statements below by selecting the phrase that correctly describes the data from Whiskey Creek Hatchery. [1]

Statement 1:

The data table shows that the highest larval survival rate of 89% occurred at

Statement 2:

The relationship between COβ‚‚ concentration and larval survival is best described as

Statement 3:

The hatchery's solution of adjusting water intake times was effective because

CASE STUDY A β€” QUESTION 2

Which row in the table below correctly describes the evidence from Whiskey Creek that explains why wild oyster populations continued to decline even after the hatchery recovered?

RowHatchery AdaptationWild Population ResponseConclusion
(1)Adjusted intake to avoid low-pH waterCannot avoid acidified water during upwellingTechnological solutions protect controlled environments but not natural ecosystems
(2)Added sodium carbonate to raise pHWild oysters produce their own sodium carbonateWild oysters will adapt naturally over time
(3)Adjusted intake to avoid low-pH waterWild oysters migrated to deeper waterMigration is a more effective strategy than water treatment
(4)Added sodium carbonate to raise pHCannot avoid acidified water during upwellingSodium carbonate is toxic to wild oyster populations
πŸ“‹ Case Study B
Great Barrier Reef β€” Queensland, Australia

The Great Barrier Reef, the world's largest coral reef system stretching over 2,300 kilometers along Australia's northeast coast, has experienced five mass bleaching events since 2016. While warming sea surface temperatures trigger the bleaching response β€” causing corals to expel their symbiotic zooxanthellae algae β€” ocean acidification compounds the damage by reducing the corals' ability to recover. Healthy coral can regrow after a bleaching event if conditions return to normal within weeks. However, in acidified water with reduced carbonate ion availability, the rate of skeletal regrowth drops by 30–50%, meaning corals take significantly longer to rebuild, leaving them vulnerable to the next bleaching event.

A 2022 survey by the Australian Institute of Marine Science documented that hard coral cover had declined from an average of 28% in 2016 to 12% in localized sections of the northern reef. Researchers measured water pH at reef sites and found values ranging from 8.05 to 7.95 β€” already below the pre-industrial baseline of 8.16. Dr. Katharina Fabricius of AIMS noted: "We're watching a compounding cycle β€” warmer water bleaches the coral, and more acidic water slows recovery. Each event leaves the reef weaker than before."

πŸ“Š DATA β€” Great Barrier Reef Hard Coral Cover (Northern Section)
YearHard Coral CoverBleaching Event?Avg pH at Reef
201528%No8.08
201622%Yes (severe)8.05
201715%Yes (severe)8.04
202018%Yes (moderate)8.01
202212%Yes (severe)7.95
CASE STUDY B β€” QUESTION 1

Which row in the table below correctly describes the evidence for the compounding cycle affecting the Great Barrier Reef?

RowInitial Stress on CoralEffect of Acidification on RecoveryLong-Term Outcome
(1)Warming causes bleaching (loss of zooxanthellae algae)Reduced carbonate ions slow skeletal regrowth by 30–50%Each bleaching event leaves reef weaker; coral cover declined from 28% to 12%
(2)Acidification causes bleaching (loss of zooxanthellae algae)Warming temperatures accelerate skeletal regrowth by 30–50%Coral adapts and cover stabilizes at 18%
(3)Warming causes bleaching (loss of zooxanthellae algae)Increased carbonate ions accelerate skeletal regrowthReef recovers fully between bleaching events
(4)Acidification causes bleaching (loss of zooxanthellae algae)Reduced carbonate ions slow skeletal regrowth by 30–50%Coral cover increases from 12% to 28% over time
CASE STUDY B β€” QUESTION 2

A student uses the data table to make several observations about the Great Barrier Reef. The observations are listed below.

Observation I β€” Hard coral cover decreased from 28% to 12% between 2015 and 2022.
Observation II β€” Average pH at the reef increased from 8.08 to 7.95 over the same period.
Observation III β€” The largest single-year decline in coral cover (7%) occurred between 2016 and 2017 during back-to-back severe bleaching events.
Observation IV β€” The reef showed a small recovery (15% to 18%) between 2017 and 2020 when no severe bleaching occurred.
Observation V β€” Coral cover was highest in 2022 because pH was closest to normal levels.

Which set of observations are correctly supported by the data?

πŸ“‹ Case Study C
Antarctic Pteropod Research β€” Southern Ocean

In 2014, researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) published a landmark study documenting severe shell damage in Limacina helicina, a species of pteropod collected from the Southern Ocean near Antarctica. Using scanning electron microscopy, the team found that 53% of pteropods collected from surface waters showed signs of shell dissolution β€” pitting, thinning, and surface erosion that had never been documented at such high rates. The damage was concentrated in regions where surface water pH measured between 7.9 and 8.0.

Pteropods are often called the "potato chips of the sea" because they are consumed by so many species. In Antarctic waters, pteropods can account for up to 60% of the diet of juvenile pink salmon and are a primary food source for zooplankton-feeding whales. NOAA scientist Dr. Nina BednarΕ‘ek estimated that by 2050, if COβ‚‚ emissions follow current trends, pteropod shell dissolution will affect 70% of the Southern Ocean pteropod population, with potential cascading effects through the entire Antarctic food web β€” from krill to penguins to seals to orcas.

πŸ“Š DATA β€” Pteropod Shell Condition vs. Ocean pH (Southern Ocean, 2014)
pH RangePteropods Sampled% with Shell DamageAvg Shell Thickness
8.10 – 8.1612012%0.42 mm
8.00 – 8.099528%0.35 mm
7.90 – 7.9914053%0.24 mm
7.80 – 7.896071%0.15 mm
CASE STUDY C β€” QUESTION 1

Complete each of the three statements below by selecting the phrase that correctly describes the pteropod data from the Southern Ocean. [1]

Statement 1:

The data shows that as ocean pH decreased from 8.10–8.16 to 7.80–7.89, the percentage of pteropods with shell damage

Statement 2:

Average shell thickness changed from 0.42 mm to 0.15 mm across the pH range, which demonstrates that

Statement 3:

The NOAA prediction that 70% of Southern Ocean pteropods will be affected by 2050 is significant because pteropods

CASE STUDY C β€” QUESTION 2

Which row in the table below correctly uses the data to describe the relationship between pH, shell condition, and the potential impact on the Antarctic food web?

RowpH TrendShell ResponseFood Web Impact
(1)pH decreases from 8.16 to 7.80Shell damage increases; thickness decreases from 0.42 to 0.15 mmReduced pteropod populations lead to declining salmon, herring, and whale populations
(2)pH increases from 7.80 to 8.16Shell damage increases; thickness increases from 0.15 to 0.42 mmIncreased pteropod populations lead to overpopulation of salmon and whales
(3)pH decreases from 8.16 to 7.80Shell damage decreases; thickness increases from 0.15 to 0.42 mmPteropod populations remain stable regardless of pH change
(4)pH increases from 7.80 to 8.16Shell damage decreases; thickness decreases from 0.42 to 0.15 mmReduced pteropod populations lead to increased krill populations
Hochman Strategy β€” Appositives
Adding Detail with Appositives

An appositive is a noun or phrase placed next to another noun to identify or describe it. Example: "Pteropods, tiny marine snails with thin calcium carbonate shells, are vulnerable to acidification."

Rewrite each sentence by adding an appositive phrase that provides additional detail. Place commas around your appositive.

HOCHMAN 1 OF 3
Original: Coral bleaching weakens reef ecosystems.

Rewrite with an appositive that defines or describes coral bleaching:
0 words
HOCHMAN 2 OF 3
Original: The Pacific Northwest oyster industry has experienced larval die-offs.

Rewrite with an appositive that adds detail about the industry's value or importance:
0 words
HOCHMAN 3 OF 3
Original: Coccolithophores play a critical role in the ocean carbon cycle.

Rewrite with an appositive that identifies what coccolithophores are:
0 words
Hochman Strategy β€” Subordinating Conjunctions
Complex Sentence Construction

Use subordinating conjunctions (although, when, if, while, since, unless, before, after) to combine ideas and show relationships between concepts.

HOCHMAN 4 OF 6
Write a complex sentence beginning with "Although" that contrasts the small pH change with its large ecological impact:
0 words
HOCHMAN 5 OF 6
Write a sentence beginning with "If" about what could happen to coral reefs if COβ‚‚ emissions continue:
0 words
HOCHMAN 6 OF 6
Write a sentence beginning with "Since" connecting the loss of pteropods to effects on larger marine animals:
0 words
πŸ“‹ Analysis Questions
Section 04
Human Impact: Real-World Data & Consequences
Analyze real-world data to evaluate how ocean acidification is already affecting economies, food security, and coastal communities.
πŸ“ 11 Points β€” 1 pt per question | 70% to advance
πŸ“Š Data Set 1
Atmospheric COβ‚‚ and Ocean pH: A 65-Year Record

Since 1958, scientists at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawai'i have continuously measured atmospheric COβ‚‚ concentration β€” a record known as the Keeling Curve. Beginning in 1988, the Aloha Station (100 km north of Hawai'i) has measured ocean surface pH at the same location. Together, these two datasets provide direct evidence that rising atmospheric COβ‚‚ is driving ocean acidification.

πŸ“Š Mauna Loa & Aloha Station Data (Selected Years)
YearAtmospheric COβ‚‚ (ppm)Ocean Surface pHAvg Global Temp Anomaly (Β°C)
19603178.120+0.02
19803398.110+0.26
19903548.100+0.45
20003698.085+0.39
20103908.075+0.72
20204148.055+1.29
20244258.045+1.45
πŸ“ˆ COβ‚‚ Concentration Over Time (ppm)
317
1960
339
1980
354
1990
369
2000
390
2010
414
2020
425
2024
DATA SET 1 β€” QUESTION 1

Complete each of the three statements below by selecting the phrase that correctly describes the Mauna Loa and Aloha Station data. [1]

Statement 1:

From 1960 to 2024, as atmospheric COβ‚‚ increased from 317 ppm to 425 ppm, ocean surface pH

Statement 2:

The rate of COβ‚‚ increase has accelerated over time. Between 1960 and 1990 COβ‚‚ rose 37 ppm in 30 years, while between 1990 and 2024 it rose

Statement 3:

A drop of 0.075 pH units (from 8.120 to 8.045) may appear small, but because the pH scale is logarithmic, this represents approximately a

πŸ“Š Data Set 2
U.S. Shellfish Industry: Economic Losses from Acidification

The U.S. shellfish industry generates over $4 billion annually and supports approximately 200,000 jobs in coastal communities. Since the early 2000s, hatcheries and wild harvest operations have documented increasing production failures linked to ocean acidification. The Pacific Northwest β€” Oregon, Washington, and northern California β€” has been especially impacted due to seasonal upwelling that brings naturally COβ‚‚-rich deep water to the surface, compounding the effects of anthropogenic (human-caused) COβ‚‚.

A 2015 NOAA economic analysis estimated that the U.S. shellfish industry could lose $400 million per year by 2060 if COβ‚‚ emissions continue at current rates. Communities in Maine, Alaska, and the Gulf Coast, where shellfish harvesting is a cultural and economic cornerstone, face the greatest vulnerability. For many of these communities, no alternative industry of comparable scale exists.

πŸ“Š U.S. Shellfish Production & Acidification Events
RegionPrimary SpeciesAnnual RevenueJobs SupportedDocumented Acidification Impact
Pacific NW (OR, WA)Pacific oyster$278 million32,00080% larval die-off (2007–2009); recurring failures
New England (ME, MA)Atlantic sea scallop$570 million48,000Shell thinning measured in scallop populations
AlaskaKing crab, salmon$1.4 billion62,000Crab shell weakening; pteropod decline in food chain
Gulf Coast (LA, TX, FL)Eastern oyster, shrimp$890 million51,000Nutrient runoff compounds acidification; oyster reef loss
πŸ“‰ Projected Annual Economic Loss Under Different COβ‚‚ Scenarios
Current (2024)
$75M
425 ppm
2040
$180M
~475 ppm
2060
$400M
~550 ppm
2060 (reduced)
$120M
~440 ppm
Blue bar shows projected losses if emissions are reduced per Paris Climate Accord targets
DATA SET 2 β€” QUESTION 1

Which row in the table below correctly uses the economic data to describe the human impact of ocean acidification on U.S. coastal communities?

RowMost Vulnerable Region (by revenue)Evidence of Current ImpactProjected Consequence
(1)Alaska ($1.4B, 62,000 jobs)Crab shell weakening; pteropod decline disrupting food chainEconomic losses could reach $400M/yr by 2060 without emissions reduction
(2)Pacific NW ($278M, 32,000 jobs)80% larval die-off in hatcheriesLosses are projected to decrease to $75M/yr by 2060
(3)New England ($570M, 48,000 jobs)No documented impacts on shellfishEconomic losses are expected to stabilize at current levels
(4)Gulf Coast ($890M, 51,000 jobs)Nutrient runoff has eliminated all oyster reefsReduced emissions would increase losses to $400M/yr
DATA SET 2 β€” QUESTION 2

A student analyzes the projected economic loss chart and makes the following observations.

Observation I β€” Projected losses increase from $75M to $400M between 2024 and 2060 if emissions continue at current rates.
Observation II β€” Reducing emissions per Paris Climate Accord targets would eliminate all economic losses by 2060.
Observation III β€” Even with reduced emissions, projected losses of $120M in 2060 show that some damage is unavoidable due to COβ‚‚ already in the ocean.
Observation IV β€” The difference between the high-emissions ($400M) and reduced-emissions ($120M) scenarios shows that policy decisions could prevent $280M in annual losses.
Observation V β€” Losses in the reduced-emissions scenario are higher than current losses, proving that emissions reduction is not effective.

Which set of observations are correctly supported by the data?

πŸ“Š Data Set 3
Coral Reefs: Ecosystem Services and Global Food Security

Coral reefs cover less than 1% of the ocean floor, yet they support approximately 25% of all marine fish species. Over 500 million people worldwide depend directly on coral reef ecosystems for food, income, and coastal protection. The total economic value of coral reef ecosystem services β€” including fisheries, tourism, coastal protection from storms, and pharmaceutical compounds β€” is estimated at $375 billion per year.

As ocean acidification progresses, scientists project that coral reefs will reach a tipping point where they dissolve faster than they grow. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that at 1.5Β°C of global warming, 70–90% of tropical coral reefs will be lost. At 2Β°C of warming, more than 99% are projected to disappear. For communities in Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, and the Caribbean, this is not an abstract environmental problem β€” it is a direct threat to survival.

πŸ“Š Coral Reef Ecosystem Services β€” Annual Economic Value
Ecosystem ServiceAnnual ValuePeople Directly DependentMost Vulnerable Regions
Fisheries & food production$6.8 billion500+ millionSoutheast Asia, Pacific Islands
Tourism & recreation$36 billion70+ million (jobs)Caribbean, Australia, Red Sea
Coastal storm protection$94 billion200+ millionLow-lying island nations
Pharmaceutical/biomedical$5.7 billionβ€”Global
πŸ“Š IPCC Projections: Coral Reef Loss by Warming Scenario
Global Warming ScenarioProjected Coral Reef LossApprox. Ocean pHCOβ‚‚ Concentration
Current (+1.2Β°C)~50% decline from 1980 levels8.05~420 ppm
+1.5Β°C (Paris target)70–90% loss~8.00~450 ppm
+2.0Β°C>99% loss~7.95~500 ppm
+3.0Β°C (current trajectory)Functional extinction~7.85~600 ppm
DATA SET 3 β€” QUESTION 1

Which row in the table below correctly describes the relationship between global warming, coral reef loss, and human impact based on the IPCC projections?

RowWarming LevelReef ConsequenceImpact on Human Populations
(1)+1.5Β°C (Paris target)70–90% of reefs lostHundreds of millions lose coastal storm protection ($94B) and food sources ($6.8B)
(2)+2.0Β°C50% of reefs recoveredTourism revenue doubles as new reef species colonize warmer waters
(3)+3.0Β°C70–90% of reefs lostPharmaceutical research expands to replace lost reef biodiversity
(4)+1.5Β°C (Paris target)>99% of reefs lostCoastal protection services increase as reefs grow in warmer water
πŸ“‹ Comprehension & Application
Final Report
Lab Results & Grade Report
Review your performance across all sections of the Ocean Acidification Investigation Lab.